Good morning, search marketers, are you ready for RSA reality?
You shouldn't be ignoring responsive search ads (RSAs) altogether, even if you've had bad luck with them — keep testing and learning because Google's made clear they aren't going anywhere. However, don't think of RSAs as the "easy button" of text ads, or you'll fail.
I've heard from many advertisers since Google acknowledged it's running a test in which RSA is the default Search ad format. Here is some of what PPC veteran and founder of Adalysis Brad Geddes had to say, "There is … an issue with the way RSAs have been discussed. One of the big benefits that is touted for RSAs is time savings. This has led many advertisers to just use the same RSA in many ad groups since Google said it'll figure out how to serve the ads. This is also where some of the performance issues of RSAs come into play.
I think RSAs will thrive in accounts that are not well setup, run by SMBs, aggregators, or those who favor speed over results. If you really don't know what you're doing, RSAs are probably the best ad format to use.
At the moment, well segmented accounts with ETAs that follow some simple formulas of ad writing (relevancy, calls to action, benefits, authority) outperform RSAs the majority of the time."
Still, some advertisers said they are starting to find some success with RSAs or at least learning how to use them more effectively.
Don't forget! A reminder to sign up to join us live on Friday for a Live with Search Engine Land discussion on closing the gender gap in SEO. I'll be joined by Nicole DeLeon, Aleyda Solis and Amanda Jordan. Sign up here.
Ginny Marvin,
Editor-In-Chief